Theory
|
Main Thesis
|
Remarks
|
Representation |
The function of a work of art is to represent portions of reality. Art should be nonfictional. |
- Subordinates art to history and survey science.
- Works best for the visual arts. Literary works have representational potential; musical works almost none.
- Favors stylistic realism. Doesn't account for the appeal of impressionistic and expressionistic works.
- This function has been largely assumed by photography.
|
Illustration |
The function of a work of art is to illustrate things like religious teachings. |
- Makes art an adjunct to other endeavors.
- Early works of art were created for primitive religious ceremonies; later works of art were commissioned to illustrate religious texts.
|
Edification and Persuasion |
The function of a work of art is to edify and persuade the perceiver. |
- Regards art as pedagogic tool and propaganda tool.
- Favors fables and moralistic dramas.
- Doesn't account for (instrumental) music.
- Was advanced by Plato.
|
Embodiment of Beauty |
The function of a work of art is to embody beauty. |
- Favors harmony over dissonance in art.
- Favors uplifting themes over depressing or disconcerting ones and nobility over commonness or degradation.
- Disparages dissonant music and visual and literary works with unpleasant themes.
|
Catharsis Induction |
The function of a work of art is to induce a catharsis in the perceiver. |
- Is based on a tension-resolution paradigm.
- Applies best to dramatic music and longer, dramatic and melodramatic literary, stage, and film works.
|
Self-expression |
The function of a work of art is to express the emotions and/or thoughts of the artist. |
- Confuses a possible function of a work of art for an artist (the producer) with the function of a work of art for the perceiver (the consumer).
- Regards art as psychological therapy for artists.
- Makes art judgments dependent on knowledge about the artist.
|
Emotional Evocation |
The function of a work of art is to evoke intended emotions in the perceiver. |
- Is broader than the Catharsis Induction theory.
- Doesn't allow that art might appeal more to the intellect than emotions.
|
Emotional Expression |
The function of a work of art is to express emotions. |
- The emotions expressed need not be evoked in the perceiver.
- Allows that works of art may resemble emotional outbursts.
|
Emotional Formulation and Representation |
The function of a work of art is to formulate and represent emotions. |
- Asserts that the function of art is not to induce emotions or express them but to formulate them.
- Claims that works of art are for intellectual appreciation.
- Was proposed by Susanne K. Langer.
|
Meaning-world |
The function of a work of art is to convey artistic meaning, a special sort of meaning, by embodying a meaning-world. |
- A meaning-world is a special plexus of ideas.
- Regards art as contributing to a rich mental life.
- Is a recent theory proposed by Ralf J. Long.
|
| Meaningful-world |
The function of a work of art is to convey humanly-significant meaning. When it does so, it serves as a vehicle of enlightenment.
|
- Builds on Long's Meaning-World theory.
- Is a response to the poverty of evaluative criteria of that theory.
- Emphasizes how art helps the individual attain fully-human stature.
- Is further discussed here.
|